Was Covid Era a Blessing in Disguise for the Patient?

Background and Aims: In the Covid era, Continuous blood glucose monitoring(CGM) was used more frequently and it proved to be quite a helpful and accurate tool for glycemic regulation. Method(s): 75 yrs old Saudi gentleman, had Type 2 diabetes >30yrs, Hypertension, Primary Hypothyroidism, dyslipidemia, mixed polyneuropathy, Iron deficiency anemia, and benign prostatic hypertrophy. In March,2020 his BP and blood glucose readings were high at home. He had a past history of subdural hematoma with hydrocephalus(staus post-shunting). He was on Glargine, oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-hypertensives, Levothyroxine, Atorvastatin, Aspirin, iron fumarate, calcium carbonate and cholecalciferol. Fully conscious, and co-operative, of average built and height.BP 170/70 mmHg, pulse 93/m, RR 18/ m,O2sat 100%, afebrile, BMI 24.96 kg/m2. Fundoscopy normal. He had dry feet and impaired monofilament and vibration testing. Result(s): Hb% 13.1g/dl(12.6 before),MCV 93.8fl,S.Ferritin 10.5ug/l(30-400),Vit.B12 270 pmol/l(145-637),HbA1c 8%(6.4 in Feb.2020).The renal, liver and thyroid functions-intact. Albumin creatinine ratio 12.23mg/g(0-30). Nerve conduction study-mixed polyneuropathy. He continued to follow-up physically even during the Covid crisis due to the elevated SMBG and BP values. Gliclazide & antihypertensive doses were optimized and Glargine was started.On patient's follow-up in August, 2020, time in range had improved to 80%(33% in June,2020),average glucose was 147 mg/dl(200 before), glucose variability was 27.8%(28.9), hypoglycemia (54-79mg/dl) was 1%(0). On last follow-up on 27.06.2022 his HbA1c had climbed up to 8.3%(7.3 in September, 2021). He was compliant to the diabetes regime, but had stopped using the Libre sensor. Conclusion(s): The case signifies the advantage of a meticulous CGM usage during the Covid pandemic, that resulted in a reasonable glycemic control.

Finding an Answer for an Adolescent with Back Pain

Case report - Introduction: This is the case of an adolescent referred to rheumatology following 5 years of back pain. After years of trying a number of treatments without much success, the cause was found to be a previously undiagnosed urological pathology. The case highlights awareness of non-rheumatological causes and incidental findings which can redirect a patient towards more appropriate treatment and reduce the potential for long-term adverse health issues and anxiety. Case report - Case description: B was referred age 16 to rheumatology with a 5-year history of lower back pain. She had previously seen paediatricians with symptoms initially attributed to constipation due to intermittent straining and hard stool. However, constipation remedies had not relieved the pain which progressed gradually to a more persistent dull ache with impact on daily activities. Various analgesics (including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories), exercises and acupuncture had not helped. There was no history of recurrent urinary tract infections or symptom correlation with fluid intake, menstruation or bowel habit. No inflammatory features or connective tissue disease symptoms were noted and family history was unremarkable Clinical examination was normal apart from mild tenderness in the lumbar region. Rheumatoid factor was borderline positive (15 iu/mL) with the rest of blood tests normal including renal function, inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), anti CCP and ANA. She had minimal microscopic haematuria without proteinuria. MRI spine in 2015 was normal. In view of her young age and symptoms affecting daily activities, STIR sequence spinal MRI was requested. This excluded any new or old inflammatory changes but incidentally identified a dilated left pelvi-calyceal system. Renal ultrasound confirmed a grossly hydronephrotic left kidney with hydroureter and minimal renal tissue suggesting longstanding obstruction. No calculi were seen. The patient was referred to urologists. Further investigations (including MRI abdomen) confirmed similar findings and a distal ureteric stricture. A MAG 3 renogram showed a normal right kidney but only 12% functioning of the left kidney. Urologists have advised surgery (removal of left kidney and ureter) which may relieve symptoms or a conservative non-surgical approach (continue analgesia, physiotherapy and monitoring). The patient and her family are relieved to have a possible cause identified and are considering the surgical option due to ongoing flank discomfort. Case report - Discussion: This was an interesting finding of hydroureter and hydronephrosis causing longstanding back pain presenting to rheumatologists. Until completion of the spondyloarthropathy protocol MRI (STIR images), aetiology had been unclear. Hydronephrosis and hydroureter has no specific age or racial predilection. Signs and symptoms may depend on whether obstruction is acute/chronic. Chronic cases may be asymptomatic or present as a dull discomfort (like this case). Some cases may only present in adulthood with pain precipitated by fluid intake. Blood tests may show impaired kidney function. Post-mortem studies suggest 50% of people have at least one renal abnormality (e.g., renal cysts, duplex ureters) with autopsy series incidence of hydronephrosis reported as 3.1%. Causes include anatomical abnormalities such as vesico-ureteric reflux, urethral strictures (usually present in childhood), calculi, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or intrapelvic neoplasms, pregnancy and infections (e.g., TB). Sudden onset unilateral renomegaly was reported in one case of primary Sjogren's with lymphocytic interstitial nephritis and positive Sjogren's autoantibodies. Our patient has no clinical or serological evidence of connective tissue disease. Minor pelvi-calyceal distension can occur as a normal finding in wellhydrated patients and pregnancy. However, significant hydronephrosis requires assessment to determine cause as it may affect long term renal function. Imaging via computed tomography, ultrasound and urograms can help guide further management. In this case the preceding cause and duration of pathology is unknown. Sterile, giant hydronephrosis treatment options include observation and ureteric stent or nephrostomy in patients unfit for surgery. Nephrectomy is advised for pain and recurrent infection in a non-functioning kidney. Complications may include bowel perforation, vascular injury and urine leakage. Both open and minimally invasive procedures have good reported outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic and exams have affected timing of any elective procedures and the patient understands surgery may or may not offer complete symptom resolution. Case report - Key learning points: . Non-inflammatory causes of back pain should always be considered in cases of persistent back pain, particularly in young people to ascertain if there is a treatable cause . Hydronephrosis cases can be asymptomatic or present with vague, intermittent, non-specific abdominal symptoms with normal physical examination with or without haematuria. This can cause diagnostic uncertainty and delay referral to urology and appropriate renal investigations . Assessment of renal function (including MAG 3 renogram) is important to guide further management . Surgical interventions (pyeloplasty/nephrectomy) may ease symptoms long term but there is no guarantee of a successful outcome and operative risks need to be considered too . Left undiagnosed, potentially this patient could have had further disruption to daily activities and both physical and mental well being.

Different routine laboratory tests in assessment of COVID-19: A case-control study

Objective: To identify helpful laboratory paprameters for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19. Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted to analyze the biological profile of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the Unit of Pulmonology at Setif hospital between January and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: the infection group and the control group with patients admitted for other pathologies. The infected group was further divided according to the course of the disease into non-severe and severe subgroups. Clinical and laboratory parameters and outcomes of admitted patients were collected. Results: The infection group included 293 patients, of whom 237 were in the non-severe subgroup and 56 in the severe subgroup. The control group included 88 patients. The results showed higher white blood cells, neutrophils, blood glucose, urea, creatinine, transaminases, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and lower levels of lymphocyte, monocyte and platelet counts, serum sodium concentration, and albumin. According to ROC curves, urea, alanine aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, and albumin were effective diagnosis indices on admission while neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, glycemia, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase were effective during follow-up. Conclusions: Some biological parameters such as neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, glycemia, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase are useful for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

REMDESIVIR-ASSOCIATED ASYMPTOMATIC BRADYCARDIA IN AN ICU PATIENT ON DEXAMETHASONE FOR COVID-19

SESSION TITLE: Cardiovascular Complications in Patients with COVID-19 SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 1:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Even though COVID-19 is the largest pandemic of the twenty-first century, little is known about the disease or its management. Remdesivir has demonstrated some activity against severe ARDS associated with COVID-19. There is a dearth of data on the adverse effects of Remdesivir. We report a case of a COVID-19 patient who developed bradycardia following the administration of Remdesivir. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old man, who tested positive for COVID-19, presented with shortness of breath (SOB) for a week. SOB was accompanied by a cough with tan-colored sputum. Past medical history included hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Physical examination showed regular rate and rhythm of the heart and diffusely decreased breath sounds. His blood pressure was 104/60 mmHg and his heart rate was 80 bpm. Oxygen saturation was 58% at room air. Significant lab results showed elevated CRP: 17.13 mg/dl, D-Dimer: 10.16 ug/mL FEU, Lactic acid: 2.5 mg/dl, Creatinine: 1.8 mg/dl, BUN: 60 mg/dl, and AST: 46 U/L. Chest x-ray showed bilateral patchy interstitial airspace opacities. Calculated Well's score of 3 indicated a moderate risk for pulmonary embolism. CT scan showed moderate bilateral diffuse areas of ground-glass lung consolidation concerning diffuse atypical infection. The patient was admitted to the ICU and started on CPAP with PEEP of 12 and FiO2 of 100%. The management included dexamethasone 6 mg oral for 10 days, Remdesivir for 5 days, and Tocilizumab given elevated CRP level. The patient was found to develop asymptomatic bradycardia with a heart rate as low as 40 bpm. An EKG obtained demonstrated sinus bradycardia without any heart block. Echocardiography showed mildly dilated right ventricle & mild aortic regurgitation. Bradycardia resolved after the last dose of Remdesivir. DISCUSSION: Remdesivir is frequently used in severe COVID-19 infections. The commonly reported adverse events affect the gastrointestinal and renal systems. The reported cardiovascular adverse events include hypotension, atrial fibrillation, and cardiac arrest. However, bradycardia is becoming increasingly encountered. Although corticosteroids are known to cause bradycardia, the patient we managed developed bradycardia following remdesivir therapy. The baseline EKG was normal and the history was non-contributory. Given the asymptomatic nature of the finding, cardiac monitoring alone sufficed. The heart rate picked up following the last dose of remdesivir further suggesting its causative role. CONCLUSIONS: Bradycardia is becoming more common with Remdesivir use. If the patient is not exhibiting any symptoms, cardiac monitoring alone should suffice;bradycardia is expected to resolve when the drug is stopped. Reference #1: Elsawah HK, Elsokary MA, Abdallah MS, ElShafie AH. Efficacy and safety of remdesivir in hospitalized Covid-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis including network meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31(4):e2187. Reference #2: Taqi M, Gillani SFUHS, Tariq M, Raza ZA, Haider MZ. Current updates on clinical management of COVID-19 infectees: a narrative review. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2021 Aug;67(8):1198-1203. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210582. PMID: 34669870. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by AISHA ADIGUN No relevant relationships by Mobeen Haider No relevant relationships by Yousra Khalid No relevant relationships by Muhammad Hasib Khalil No relevant relationships by Aleena Naeem No relevant relationships by Zarlakhta Zamani

Safety and efficacy of REZUM for the treatment of BPH in an Australian cohort

Introduction & Objectives: Minimally invasive transurethral therapies for benign prostatic hypertension are becoming increasingly common in Europe and America. They may be performed under local anaesthetic and provide a good alternative to invasive procedures in a COVID era. REZUM, a minimally invasive transurethral water-vapor therapy, has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for BPH, especially where preserved sexual function is a priority. Although short-term clinical outcomes are promising, long-term data from robust studies is lacking. In Australia, there are few providers of REZUM, which utilises steam injections to reduce prostatic tissue. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of REZUM in an Australian cohort. Methods: A clinical audit was conducted of 50 patients who underwent REZUM to treat symptoms of BPH over a 12-month period. Procedures were performed under general anaesthetic. Demographics, comorbidities, sexual function, prostate volume, PSA, voiding flow rate, post-void residual volume and International Prostate Symptom Score were extracted from medical records, in addition to patient's reasons for seeking minimally invasive treatment. Corresponding post-operative data was collected. Descriptive statistics of the cohort were obtained using Stata 16.0. Paired t-test was used to identify if there was a significant difference between IPSS scores pre- and postprocedure Results: Patients accessing treatment ranged from 48 to 84 years (mean 64.6). Median prostate volume was 55mL (inter-quartile range 45-78mls) and mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 20.3. 28% of the cohort cited concern for ejaculatory function, either from medication side effects or TURP, as their primary reason for seeking minimally invasive treatment. A further 25% of the cohort was additionally concerned about other side effects from medications and/or TURP or had experienced medication failure. The mean follow up period was 6 months (range 6-weeks-26 months). 69% of men were satisfied with their symptom improvement at the time of review, with the expectation of ongoing improvement in men who had attended a 6-week post-operative review only. Postprocedure mean IPSS was 7.9 (range 2-33). Mean reduction in IPSS score post-procedure was 12.7 points (p<0.001). 3 men experienced complications (retention, infection, bulbar stricture). Conclusions: REZUM provides a safe alternative to traditional invasive prostatic treatments. It may be performed under local anaesthetic, providing an effective alternative in a COVID era. Men concerned about medications, more invasive treatments and ejaculatory dysfunction are increasingly seeking relief from this minimally invasive option and experiencing good outcomes including significant symptom improvement sustained over medium-term follow up.

LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP OF AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY IMPLANTABLE NITINOL DEVICE (ITIND) IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS FOR BPH

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To report IPSS, QoL and treatment failure rate up to 79-months for the MT02 study with implantation of the temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind;Medi- Tate Ltd®, Israel) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: Three out of nine international centers consented to continue the international prospective multicenter study on patients with LUTS due to BPO (IPSS ≥10, Qmax <12ml/sec, and prostate volume <75ml) beyond 36 months following implantation of iTind. Out of the originally enrolled 81 patients, 50 were followed-up at sites in Italy, Switzerland, and Belgium. Due to Covid-19 the originally planned follow-up scheme was amended: Each patient was assessed once during a timeframe of 50-79 months post-operatively by IPSS and IPSS-QoL, change in medication and adverse events via a telephone call. Patients were analyzed in three groups according to their follow-up time point (clustered into groups from 48-59 months, 60-71 months, and 72-83 months). RESULTS: Fifty to 79 months results were available for 42 patients. Four patients were lost to follow-up and two patients deceased from reasons unrelated to the iTind device. Only two patients had treatment failures (one patient underwent TURP, the other ThuLEP), while no patient required any additional medication. IPSS average results were 12.63±8.84 (50-59m, N=24), 8.85±5.54 (60-71m, N =13) and 9.20 ±5.85 (72-79m, N=5). QoL average results were 2.21±1.69 (50-59m, N=24), 1.85±0.99 (60-71m, N=13) and 1.80±1.10 (72-79m, N=5). IPSS (-8.88, -10.31, and -9.60) and IPSSQoL (-2.04, -1.85 and -1.80) improved significantly for all groups vs. baseline, respectively (p <0.0001). Functional data is shown in Figure 1. No late post-operative complications were observed between 50 and 79 months. CONCLUSIONS: iTind for treatment of LUTS secondary to BPO is an effective and safe procedure providing significant and effective reduction in symptoms and quality of life durable up to 79 months (6.6 years) with only 4% of treatment failures after 3-year follow-up. (Figure Presented).

IMPACT OF SARS-COV-2 PANDEMIC ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND SURGICAL INTERVENTION OF COMMON UROLOGICAL CONDITIONS: RESULTS FROM A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL DATABASE FROM THE UNITED STATES

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) pandemic threatened access to healthcare, raising concerns that patients were going underdiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of our study was to understand the impact of the COVID pandemic on diagnosis and surgical management of common urological conditions. METHODS: Using a large multi-center electronic health record network (TRINETx) consisting of 46 healthcare organizations, we conducted an epidemiological study investigating the number of patients newly diagnosed with common urological conditions and those undergoing urologic surgeries at yearly intervals from March 1st, 2016 to March 1st, 2021. Relevant international classification of diseases (ICD) codes used to identify urologic conditions are elaborated on in Table 1. Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes used to identify surgeries are detailed in Figure 1. We then determined the percentage of newly diagnosed patients who underwent surgery for each specific year. RESULTS: We saw a decrease in number of all urologic surgeries being performed during the initial year of the pandemic (Figure 1). From March 2020-2021, there was a >20% decrease in surgical case load for benign prostatic hyperplasia procedures (-29.5%), prostate biopsies (-30.1%), incontinence procedures (-33.6%), and vasectomies (-22.8%), compared to the preceding year. Radical cystectomies and orchiectomies saw the lowest decrease, -5.9% and -8.6%, respectively. A similar trend was seen in the number of individuals newly diagnosed with urologic conditions and percentage of patients undergoing surgical intervention. The lowest drops were seen with ureteral stent placements (-5.0%) and prostate biopsies (-3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of people receiving urologic diagnoses and surgical case load for urologic procedures significantly reduced during the first year of the COVID pandemic. Providers should be aware of this healthcare disparity, and greater efforts made to identify these missed patients moving forward.

ULTRASTRUCTURAL FINDINGS OF COVID-19 INFECTION IN THE PROSTATE

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 utilizes two integral membrane proteins ACE2 and TMPRSS2 for viral replication. It has been established TMPRS22 specifically is found in high concentrations throughout the prostate found to be linked to prostatic disease progression. This project examined the histopathological, ultrastructural, and immunofluorescent elements of prostatic tissue from men infected by SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We evaluated prostate tissue in men with worsening lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent HoLEP procedure after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Biopsied tissue was visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunofluorescence, and viral presence was confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Multiple coronavirus-like spiked viral particles ranging from 73.3mm to 109mm were visualized by TEM (Figure). Histochemical and immunofluorescence concurrently showed presence of distinct hyalinization, fibrosis, and presence of spike protein (Figure 2). RT-PCR confirmed the identity of the viral bodies as SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 3). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that SARSCoV- 2 not only enters prostatic tissue but may persist beyond initial infection period. In addition to establishing the persistence of SARSCoV- 2 particles in prostatic tissue, this report suggests the importance of discerning the relationships between COVID-19, lower urinary tract symptom severity, and prostatic hyperplasia. (Figure Presented).

Severe hypernatriemia refractory to therapy in patient with SARS-CoV2 infection

Background: In December 2019, pneumonia-like syndrome with unknown etiology was observed in China. Later on, a new coronavirus was identified, named SARS-CoV-2. We present a case of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia complicated by severe hypernatriemia refractory to therapy. Description of the case: A 60-year-old man with mild dyspnea came at the DEA. He reported infection with SARS-CoV-2 from a week. He reported no medical history except for prostatic hypertrophy. At the entrance the patient was lucid, oriented and cooperative. The B.P. was 130/75 with pulse 75 bpm, apyretic, SpO2 88% on A.A. To DEA showed examinations: D-Dimer 291, fibrinogen 744, VES 84, PCR 21.4, Ferritin 17347, LDH 532, normal electrolytes. The EGA (Reservoir 60%) detected: pO2 61.8 mmHg, pCO2 42.7, pH 7.45, SpO2 89% and P/F 103. The Rx thorax showed multiple hazy parenchymal opacities in the lower lobar seat bilaterally. He was submitted to therapy based on dexamethasone, fluid therapy, antibiotics, enoxaparin. After 36 hours, he presented progressive deterioration of the cognitive state and blood tests showed hypernatriemia (154 mmol). He undergoing therapy, sodium (168 mmol) worsened . After six days he died. Conclusions: While the multisystem impact of SARS-CoV-2 has been well established only recently been described the incidence of the disruption of sodium homeostasis in patients with CoViD- 19. The peculiarity of this case-report is given by the early and serious hypernatriemia as an uncommon complication. This suggests that others processes related to CoViD-19 might be the mechanism of dysnatremias in hospitalized patients.